tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (new question for subquestion?)2019-10-21T14:20:29-07:00http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/
Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher
Qiaochu Yuan comments on "new question for subquestion?" (14633)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1056/new-question-for-subquestion/?Focus=14633#Comment_146332011-05-27T09:54:39-07:002019-10-21T14:20:29-07:00Qiaochu Yuanhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/13/
I don't see why not. There's no need to save space on MO; starting a new question focuses the discussion, and you can still link the two questions to each other.
I don't see why not. There's no need to save space on MO; starting a new question focuses the discussion, and you can still link the two questions to each other.
]]>
Martin B. comments on "new question for subquestion?" (14632)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1056/new-question-for-subquestion/?Focus=14632#Comment_146322011-05-27T08:25:33-07:002019-10-21T14:20:29-07:00Martin B.http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/221/
For this question http://mathoverflow.net/questions/56887/rigidity-of-the-category-of-schemes it would be very good to know if the property "quasicompact" can be characterized ...