tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Discussion of Firoozbakht conjecture)2019-07-18T05:06:17-07:00http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/
Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher
Will Jagy comments on "Discussion of Firoozbakht conjecture" (18752)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1326/discussion-of-firoozbakht-conjecture/?Focus=18752#Comment_187522012-03-15T11:26:26-07:002019-07-18T05:06:17-07:00Will Jagyhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/208/
Right. Quid's answer suffices. In fact, my understanding was that numerical evidence supported Granville's constant coefficient fairly well, and tends to discredit a coefficient of 1. Not sure where ...
So I think the original question was a bit wrongheaded in the first place. Also voted to close.]]>
Angelo comments on "Discussion of Firoozbakht conjecture" (18751)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1326/discussion-of-firoozbakht-conjecture/?Focus=18751#Comment_187512012-03-15T11:24:20-07:002019-07-18T05:06:17-07:00Angelohttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/483/
I also voted to close.
Vladimir Dotsenko comments on "Discussion of Firoozbakht conjecture" (18750)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1326/discussion-of-firoozbakht-conjecture/?Focus=18750#Comment_187502012-03-15T11:15:14-07:002019-07-18T05:06:17-07:00Vladimir Dotsenkohttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/676/
The question I am referring to is http://mathoverflow.net/questions/90327/any-progress-on-the-firoozbakht-conjectureLet me just repeat the comment I left there: Given the pointless discussion user ...
Let me just repeat the comment I left there: Given the pointless discussion user 'humble' continues posting more and more comments as new answers, I vote to close as "no longer relevant".

(It keeps bumping the question on the top without any good reason, really. I think the diagnosis of quid and Ben Green is very accurate, and in any case the answer to the original question given by quid is surely sufficient.)]]>